O death, where is thy sting? O grave, where is thy victory?

New Covenant = a better sacred trust: many called, few chosen. r u clothed in equity?

    how has one's journey continued in spiritual maturity after a realization of a full preterist view of the covenants?  have we failed to fully comprehend what a covenant is, and how to not enter into them again after being redeemed by so great a price

    can one say how it has changed their view of the kingdom, and point to the fruits of how it has changed their relations with the society and its institutions around them?  can one remain in double-mindedness, or must we "obey God rather than men"?

    why hasn't the world been turned right-side up again, after coming into the truth of the spiritual nature of the kingdom?  why hasn't it overcome, and transformed our neighborhoods, communities, social and governmental institutions?  could it be something is still missing from our understanding of the nature of the spiritual kingdom of a fulfilled eschatological view of the covenants?

    Why do people think they can "see" or "enter" the kingdom (John 3:3,5) without being "clothed in righteousness" (i.e. equity) (Eph. 6:14)????

"...when the king came in to see the guests, he spotted a man who was not dressed in wedding clothes. ‘Friend,’ he asked, ‘how did you get in here without wedding clothes?’ But the man was speechless. Then the king told the servants, ‘Tie him hand and foot and throw him outside into the outer darkness, where there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth.’ for many are called, but few are chosen.”

    "You are mistaken because you do not know the Scriptures or the power of God. ...  concerning the resurrection of the dead, have you not read what God said to you: ‘I am the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob?’ He is not God of the dead, but of the living.”

"which commandment is the greatest in the Law?” Jesus declared, “‘Love (agape) the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind.’ This is the first and greatest commandment. And the second is like it: ‘Love (agape) your neighbor as yourself.’ All the Law and the Prophets depend on these two commandments.”

agape =

    "Love does no wrong to its neighbor. Therefore love is the fulfillment of the Law."
    "The entire Law is fulfilled in a single decree: "Love your neighbor as yourself."
    "let us love one another, because love comes from God. Everyone who loves has been born of God and knows God."

... "for He comes to judge the earth. He will judge the world with righteousness,
and the peoples with equity."

Maxims of Equity:
1 Equity sees that as done what ought to be done
2 Equity will not suffer a wrong to be without a remedy
3 Equity delights in equality/Equality is equity (Aequalitus est quasi equitas)
4 One who seeks equity must do equity
5 Equity aids the vigilant not the indolent
6 Equity imputes an intent to fulfill an obligation
7 Equity acts in personam (i.e. on persons rather than on objects)
8 Equity abhors a forfeiture
9 Equity does not require an idle gesture
10 He who comes into equity must come with clean hands
11 Equity delights to do justice and not by halves
12 Equity will take jurisdiction to avoid a multiplicity of suits
13 Equity follows the law
14 Equity will not assist a volunteer
15 Where equities are equal, the law will prevail
16 Between equal equities the first in order of time shall prevail
17 Equity will not complete an imperfect gift
18 Equity will not allow a statute to be used as a cloak for fraud
19 Equity will not allow a trust to fail for want of a trustee
20 Equity regards the beneficiary as the true owner

    since a "trust" can be declared by a "will" alone (if the intent is for a charitable purpose), why would one not see the new covenant as an 'executory contract' with "equity eyes"? Is not the christ, yahshua, the testator? (Heb 1 & 9)
* trust: :
* will:
* executory:
* equity:
* deed:

Gives new meaning to the word "faith" in James 2:18 doesn't it? Show me your faith without deeds, and I will show you my trust by my deeds. [/quote]
   * faith & trust are same: (definition: faith, belief, trust, confidence; fidelity, faithfulness.)
   * if the maxim is "equity sees as done, what ought to be done" and the world has already been judged with righteousness, and the people with equity (ps. 98:0), why do we remain hesitant between two opinions and remain in double-mindedness?

    just because one may be under the "grace" (equity) of a new, better sacred trust does that give one license to "sin" so grace may increase? or does it give license to once again become slaves to men, after being redeemed by so great a price? by a specie of payment greater than gold/silver and the bankrupt traditions of men?
    is coming out of babylon (idolatry) and egypt (slavery) really so complicated once one sees the matter in light of the James 2?

    isn't it time to go deeper into spiritual maturity?

3- paradise restored: rehabilitation of (PTSD) post-traumatic slavery disorder thru
separation from church & state  April 1, 2018 (posted on "Easter")

2 - without a vision, people perish: but one who listens to instruction will be happy
March 21, 2018

1 - …greater things you will do…  the “royal priesthood”
March 9, 2018

   without "immersion", there is no death to "adam" who is still under the curse of the law.  without the "payment" (i.e. blood + life) the curse can not be redeemed/paid-in-full.  without "burial" there can be no "closing of the (PUBLIC) account".  without "resurrection" (new spiritual birth John 3:3,5) there is no new creation as a "son of man" (in the image of the 2nd adam).  so "Gal. 3:27, Acts 2:38, Rom 6" go together.  which makes the "deed" of the one who "laid down his life for his friends" what makes a new sacred trust possible, for those who confess this deed as what they "trust" in.

Views: 637

Comment by Onlashuk SHUGAHARRA on September 1, 2018 at 3:06pm

The unresolved question involving the biblical principal, "No man can serve two masters," still appears to be an unanswered question in regards to, "make your call and election sure." What good is the finished work and judgment of AD33 if mankind is still volunteering to be surety for the debts of another man thereby nullifying the finished work of Christ, before the foundation of THIS WORLD was laid, for being the Surety for one's sins/debts? Indeed, this does appear to be at the core of a 'double mind,' that is still present within mankind for having not yet changed their mind and ascended into the Son of Man by proving their 'trustworthiness' in relation to the Will of the Testator as expressed in the New Covenant.

Since the administration of the one government changed from bankruptcy to pure unadulterated equity in AD70, what is the hang-up? Why hasn't the truth of, "Christ in you, the hope of glory," not reached the four corners of the Earth in nearly 2000 years since the event of the judgment in AD33 and the second coming in AD70? Yes, there is in fact something missing. Otherwise, one would be seeing with their very literal eyes, the kingdom of god manifesting itself, "...on this earth, as it is in heaven." So, what needs to be fixed, changed and/or upgraded?

Comment by M Todd on September 1, 2018 at 4:47pm

    church-state-blinders.  church-state colored glasses.  neo-pharisee definitions to new covenant doctrine.  I could name about a dozen more "blinding" factors that prevent most "preterists" from understanding the moral-ethical-agape-duty of a fulfilled eschatological view of the 5th Kingdom putting an end to all "nation-states" - see The Fifth Kingdom

    so lets start by defining "terms" (i.e. biblical words, perverted by the world):

1. serve:

2. master:

3. calling:

4. election:

5. sure:

6. judgment:

7. work:

8. volunteer:

9. surety:

10. debts:

11. foundation:

12.  world:

13. double-minded:

14. ascend:

15. present:

16. trust:

17. worthiness:

18. relation:

19: will:

20: testator:

21. covenant:

22. administration:

23. bankruptcy:

24. unadulterated:

25. equity:

26. truth:

27. hope:

28. glory:

29. literal:

30. kingdom:

31. manifesting:

now this may seem "extreme", but short of taking a bat upside the head of the church-indoctrinated double-minded, what else will set-apart (make holy) people out of neo-pharisee idolatry if they don't begin by correcting their PRESUMPTIONS of what words mean from their past church-state indoctrination?

32:  presumption:

33: indoctrination:


the reason the message isn't getting thru, is because they appeal to an "emergency" that they themselves did not declare.  who declared commercial war upon the people?  who made "commerce" the "emergency" in the "nation-state" one finds ones-self within?  did you voluntarily choose this?  or did you 'go-along' out of necessity for the sake of 'survival'?  was "life" prioirites of "going along, to get along" more important that doing what was "right, equitable and just" according to the new covenant?

    lets' lay down the guantlet and call a pharisee a pharisee, shall we not?  how many compromises have we made with the "legal society in control" of the "default" governing "process" we find ourselves within in this "religious society" controlled by a "constitution"? 

    lets get to the root-cause of the idolatry... so we can focus on what needs to be "circumcised" from our hearts, and crucified from our "self", eh?

Comment by Daniel Angus on October 27, 2018 at 9:19pm

I am curious, with all the things I have learned and more so, unlearned in my journey in faith in Christ. I was mistaken indeed by accepting the personification given to me by my mother(the B.C.) and using it to gain things (licenses, accounts and many papers). Now I have closed accounts, canceled voter registry and not used the ALL CAPS NAME for a while now, as it (the NAME) belongs to Caesar and we are to render the things that belong to Caesar to Caesar and that, that belongs to God to God. The "PERSON" is Caesar's, I am God's. The "Person" is a Cest Qui Vie Trust with the B.C. being a counterfeit token of value that can be redeemed, but not for cash. I do not want cash! I am wishing to be private and beneficiary to the estate of Christ through adoption. This being said, my question is this: Some say I need to create a new Identity through Baptism in a new name, Ordained in a free church, create a Private Non-Statutory Trust, Business Trust, Asset Holding Trust  with an E.I.N. not perfected etc.. But my understanding at this point is that the testator/our Father has already created a trust for us, for when we fulfill his will for us by following his last will and testament by proclaiming Christ to be king to men/the Administrators of the world by attorning from my allegiance as a citizen of the world to an heir by adoption of his ways and allegiance to the Most High, our true father in heaven. 

Comment by M Todd on November 7, 2018 at 6:38pm

    you've made me curiuos why you feel "accepting" the "personification given to me by my mother (the B.C.) was a "mistake" or actually something you truly did?  isn't the opposite the problem?  the fact one never actually "accepted" it, nor expressed any 'intent' when doing so, but instead went off and used it for personal I.D. instead as a belligerent "Trustee de son tort? where does this idea come from that "accepting" the B.C. is a bad thing?  who told you that?  isn't that the problem?  people tell us a bunch of things, on youtube and other "talking" sources but never define anything or seek the truth out for oneself if such is truly so?

    why would anyone want "closed accounts"?  learn that from the a4v/ucc gurus?  isn't it time to stop listening to all these people and seek out the logic (logos) of the mind of christ

    does the "NAME" really belong to Caesar?  who says?  sounds like another silly youtube-guru fallacy without any evidence to back it up.  who told you this?  or what actual evidence did one find to validate this as truth?  why did jesus actually help pontius pilate out when it was the angry jewish pharisees calling for his death?  Pilate actually said he found no fault in him, washed his hands of the matter, and declared the blood of killing the annointed one (the christ) was upon the pharisee's head and their children.  historically rome has always been neutral (which will be gone into more detail in the reply to The 5th Kingdom Established AD70

     who told you the "person" is a cest que vie trust (i.e. the beneficiary)?  who told you this total falsehood, that can't be proven, and has no evidence to support such a claim?  at least you correctly quote marcus of "" correctly in stating the B.C. can be redeemed, but not for money.  so half truth is still no truth at all.

     why do you want to be "private"?  what benefit is there to being private?  why do you want to be "beneficiary to the estate of christ"?  you want to replace the christ as the "heir of all things"?  isn't that the problem with all the youtube-jockeys, and internet-gurus spreading half-truths and unverified direct contradictions of the logos of one's creator?  what's worse, is people spreading half-truths that they heard from others, without verifying anything for themselves.  maybe go back and review the first video in marcus' series:  Confusion of the Mind where he explains: "the problem in solving a problem using your mind, when the problem...

    some say?  who says?  why does anyone need a "new identity"?  what is "an identity"?  isn't that the problem, not the solution?  isn't the opposite the truth?  one needs to die to "IDentity"?  why does one need a "new name"?  what good is a "name"?  where do these silly sayings come from?

     Who says all these other things are needed?  why does one need to be "ordained in a free church" or "create a trust for us" (who is this "us")?  where does the testator of the new, better sacred trust (i.e. the christ - heb 1:2) say any one needs an "E.I.N. not perfected" or otherwise"?  I don't know where that scripture and verse can be found in abba's words in the book of books popularly known as "the bible", you got a reference?  again, who is inventing all these half-truths, delusions, and double-mindedness?

      where does your understanding come from re "the testator/our Father has already created a trust for us"?  really?  who told you this?  where did this double-mindedness get dreamed up?  does heb 1:2 say the testator is "our Father" (the pope in the Vatican, or which father)?

     does one "fulfill his will for us by following his last will and testament" by "proclaiming Christ to be king to men/the Administrators of the world by attorney from my allegiance to the world"?  um... I can't find that in any verse.  can imagine how that double-mindedness can be hobbled together by quoting parts and pieces of different sections and mixing it all up in a blender.

    what does "attorning from my allegiance as a citizen of the world to an heir by adoption of his ways and alliance to the most high" mean?  where does that come from?  who says?  what "will" says that is how to do something? 

    May I suggest reading a simple book called "Obedience Training" by B.A. Hunter?  it may help.  if you need a printable and searchable copy in pdf format and promise to read it, send me a private request.  it may help break down all the confusion expressed from wherever you heard all the above from.

Comment by Daniel Angus on November 10, 2018 at 1:55pm

    I realize one should ask better questions.
    Yes the problem was that I used the B.C. as I.D. which it was not intended to be used as and yes I used it as a belligerent “Trustee de son tort”.
    What is one to do to correct this wrong doing? As I wish to be in honor with our creator Abba/father.
    I do admit to being double-minded, of the world and looking to Christ, a fumbling idiot concerning many things but looking for truth regardless. I am not worthy, thank you, as I have listened to many guru's and walked away from them to find Christ. This is why I am here to learn the truth in the ways of Christ.
    I do not wish to replace Christ but to follow him, how does one fulfill the law and return to equity?
    I appreciate the fact that one has opened my eyes to the double mindedness I speak of. My concern is not for the ways of the world but of that which pertains to God only. I have been commingling the two realms in confusion.
    I no longer wish to be the prodigal child, how does one truly correct ones path and return to eden?
    I know nothing for certain, even the bibles of today do not quote scriptures perfectly, as I am now using e-sword to reference the original words used, any help in regards to proper comprehension of the Way, the Truth and the Light would be greatly appreciated.
    The new Testament is Christ's promise of a new and better covenant is it not? Would that be his last will and testament to the ones that are called to overcome the world and return to eden through his blood sacrifice?
    As a co-heir, not the heir?  
As an adoptive son?
    If one is sure that reading this Book, Obedience Training" by B.A. Hunter ( would help clear the world from the double-mindedness this one is experiencing, then yes I would be interested in reading it.

Comment by M Todd on January 2, 2019 at 4:44am

    so, what conclusions have you come to after reading Obedience Training? how far did you get in the month and a half since I sent you the PDF? what "better questions" did it inspire you to ask?

     did you find answers to any of the questions you asked above?  do wishes matter?  many are called, but few are chosen.  what must one do to make one's 'calling and election sure"?

     how is a prodigal son reformed, born new, transfigured, etc. into a "son of man?" how is one adopted as "son"?  who is the one doing the adopting?  notice how there are not grandson's, only adopted sons? 

     who is the heir of all things?  if that heir is heir to ALL things, what is left to "inherent" by any "man"?  where does this idea come from that one becomes an "heir"?  if it is all about the heir of all things, what relation can one create with such an heir?

     why would one "wish" to no longer be a prodigal?  isn't the "way" to "return to eden" defined in said 'will" of the testator of this new, and better covenant?  so isn't it as easy as reading the will for instruction on how this is done?


You need to be a member of Deathisdefeated to add comments!

Join Deathisdefeated

Olivet Discourse Movie

How the Olivet Discourse was fulfilled in the first century.
Matthew 24, Mark 13, Luke 21
Riley O'Brien Powell



Delivered from the Law

Started by Internet_Troll in Questions and Best Answers We Can Give!. Last reply by Internet_Troll Apr 15. 13 Replies

FEAR obviously struck..

Started by Julia A Waldron in Eschatology. Last reply by John Mar 24. 1 Reply

For the Preterist

Started by Julia A Waldron in Eschatology. Last reply by Julia A Waldron Mar 24. 22 Replies

Isaiah 2:2-4 Used to refute preterism

Started by Steve G. in Eschatology. Last reply by Patricia Watkins Aug 13, 2018. 1 Reply

This Site Active?

Started by Doug in Eschatology. Last reply by Patricia Watkins Jul 29, 2018. 28 Replies

Gen 1 vs Isa 51

Started by Internet_Troll in Eschatology. Last reply by Internet_Troll May 3, 2018. 4 Replies

The sin of the Gentiles

Started by Internet_Troll in Questions and Best Answers We Can Give!. Last reply by Brother Les Jan 18, 2018. 3 Replies

Adam as Israel

Started by Internet_Troll in Eschatology. Last reply by Internet_Troll Nov 5, 2017. 9 Replies

Though he dies yet shall he live

Started by Internet_Troll in Questions and Best Answers We Can Give!. Last reply by Internet_Troll Apr 25, 2017. 8 Replies

The parousia and judgment of nations

Started by Internet_Troll in Eschatology. Last reply by Joseph Rehby Jul 6, 2017. 16 Replies

Preterist Networking

Started by Judy Peterson in Prayer Requests. Last reply by Judy Peterson Apr 8, 2018. 21 Replies

The 10 Tribes of Israel

Started by Internet_Troll in Questions and Best Answers We Can Give!. Last reply by Judith Ann Maness Aug 4, 2018. 10 Replies

Online Teaching Elders

Started by Eohn Rhodes in Eschatology. Last reply by Doug Dec 22, 2015. 4 Replies

Who is the abomination of desolation ?

Started by Stairway To Heaven in Eschatology. Last reply by Brother Les Dec 11, 2015. 3 Replies

Divine council

Started by Sharon Q in Eschatology. Last reply by Sharon Q Oct 3, 2015. 5 Replies

© 2019   Created by Tim Martin.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service